Siteimprove accessibility, quality, and SEO workflow examples

This page collects Siteimprove-linked examples centered on digital quality, accessibility, content cleanup, migrations, and selected SEO gains. The dataset is more coherent than many vendor pages, but it still works best as a workflow library rather than a pure SEO success-story collection.

How to read this page

The strongest recurring themes here are accessibility, QA, content governance, and site-wide operational improvement. SEO appears in several entries, but it is usually part of a broader digital quality workflow rather than the only story.

Siteimprove highlights from included examples

These are selected takeaways from the examples collected on this page, not a standardized benchmark across all vendors.

Accessibility score example

100%

Northern Arizona Healthcare after CMS migration

Quality assurance score

99%

Also from the Northern Arizona Healthcare case

Reported #1 ranking growth

13 to 90

QV Skincare top-position increase

Reported error resolution change

8 months to 8 days

QV Skincare issue-response improvement

Page reduction example

80%

Fackförbundet Vision while still growing traffic

Traffic range example

250K to 450K+

Openreach reported visit growth

Included Siteimprove examples

Openreach

Openreach: Accessibility and quality improvements alongside traffic growth

Key results

Traffic range

250K to 450K+

Quality assurance score

76.2% to 97%

Reported team efficiency

+20%

Challenge

Openreach needed to improve digital quality, accessibility, and team efficiency while supporting a broader effort to strengthen its long-term digital presence.

How the tool was used

The published case describes Siteimprove being used for accessibility improvements, quality assurance checks, and more efficient issue handling across the site. The platform appears here as a digital quality and governance layer rather than a narrow SEO-only tool.

Results

The case reports traffic growth from 250,000 to over 450,000 visits, quality assurance improvements from 76.2% to 97%, and a 20% increase in team efficiency. Because the story spans multiple improvement areas, it is best read as a digital quality workflow example.

Takeaways

This example fits the cluster as a broader accessibility and quality case, not just an SEO performance story. The main value is how Siteimprove supported cross-functional digital improvement.

Springfield Clinic

Springfield Clinic: Site overhaul guided by content cleanup and QA review

Key results

SEO score

76.76 to 86.7

Page reduction

60%

Site search volume

+30%

Challenge

Springfield Clinic had an overloaded site with around 2,500 pages, many of them outdated or no longer useful. The challenge was to rebuild the website in a way that improved usability without losing important visibility and content value.

How the tool was used

The team used Siteimprove to audit the existing site, identify outdated pages, review quality issues, and guide decisions about what to keep, remove, or improve. Siteimprove functioned as a site cleanup and prioritization layer during the redesign.

Results

The case reports an SEO score increase from 76.76 to 86.7, a 60% reduction in total pages, and a 30% increase in daily site search volume. This makes the example especially relevant for content consolidation and site restructuring workflows.

Takeaways

This is one of the stronger Siteimprove examples because it connects QA, SEO, and content governance to a major site overhaul with concrete before-and-after numbers.

Northern Arizona Healthcare

Northern Arizona Healthcare: Accessibility-first CMS migration example

Key results

Accessibility score

100%

Quality assurance score

99%

Migration

Drupal to WordPress

Challenge

Northern Arizona Healthcare needed to migrate from Drupal to WordPress while ensuring the new site stayed highly accessible and nearly error-free, despite limited team capacity.

How the tool was used

The team used Siteimprove during and after the migration to surface accessibility problems, catch QA issues, and track progress with shared scores. In this case, Siteimprove acts as a migration support and standards enforcement layer.

Results

The case reports a perfect 100% accessibility score and a 99% quality assurance score after the migration. These are unusually strong outputs, but they clearly fit the page as a migration-and-quality workflow example.

Takeaways

This entry is best read as an accessibility-focused migration case study. Its value is showing how Siteimprove can support standards-driven site transitions with a small team.

Fackförbundet Vision

Fackförbundet Vision: Traffic growth after reducing page count by 80%

Key results

Reported traffic increase

+6%

Page reduction

80%

Active users

3 to 20

Challenge

The organization needed to simplify a large website that had become difficult to manage, without damaging visibility or usefulness for members. They also needed to spread quality ownership beyond a very small core team.

How the tool was used

Siteimprove was used first for basic quality fixes and then more broadly for distributed site management and SEO-focused landing page work. The tool supported content reduction, quality control, and wider organizational participation.

Results

The case reports an 80% reduction in page count together with a 6% traffic increase, while active users of the platform grew from 3 to 20. This makes it a good governance and content-prioritization example, not just a traffic story.

Takeaways

This is one of the more useful Siteimprove examples because it shows that aggressive content reduction can coexist with stronger performance when quality and prioritization improve.

QV Skincare

QV Skincare: Search visibility and issue-resolution gains during digital cleanup

Key results

#1 keyword rankings

13 to 90

Error resolution time

8 months to 8 days

Core Web Vitals

+23%

Challenge

QV Skincare needed to improve search visibility, address technical problems faster, and strengthen the customer journey in a competitive skincare market.

How the tool was used

The case describes Siteimprove being used to identify technical SEO issues, improve content visibility, shorten response times for site errors, and support better performance on important pages such as 'Where to Buy'.

Results

The published case reports #1 keyword rankings increasing from 13 to 90, error-resolution time dropping from 8 months to 8 days, and Core Web Vitals improving by 23%. This is the clearest SEO-heavy example in the dataset.

Takeaways

This is probably the strongest pure SEO example on the page, though it still sits inside a broader digital quality story rather than a single-channel SEO narrative.

Back to all case study collections

Compare more SEO tools

Using this library to benchmark tools or workflows? The SEO Tool Finder can help you compare options by use case, experience level, and budget.

Explore SEO tool options

Ready to Find Your Perfect SEO Tools?

Stop wasting time and money on SEO tools that don't meet your needs. Let our analytics-powered algorithm match you with the perfect SEO software in just 30 seconds.

  • Compare 34 leading SEO tools including Semrush, Ahrefs and Moz
  • Find tools for keyword research, rank tracking, technical SEO and more
  • Get personalized recommendations based on your specific needs
Find Your Perfect SEO Tools Now

No registration required. 100% free to use. Unbiased recommendations.

SEO professionals analyzing digital marketing tools and software for optimal website performance